23 Tracy Circle So even my casual readers will recognize this house and address, 23 Tracy Circle as a recent Party House of the Weekend winner. Yes, the losers who created the Facebook page "Fuck The Fines" are b-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-ck. And yes, they were fined $1,800 for Friday's late night party.
According to APD narrative:
"Upon arrival Officers could clearly hear loud TV, noise and voices laughing and shouting from open windows. Several people could be seen through a partially open picture window . There have been 5-6 calls to house #23 for the same complaints with verbal warnings as well as written Town By Law citations. Three residents were placed under arrest for noise violation and nuisance house. 12-15 guests were asked to leave and the house was secured."
Arrested and charge with noise and nuisance house:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx age 21
Emerson E. Rutkowski, 36 Puritan Park, Swampscott, MA age 20
Michael Upham, 53 Sherwood Road, Swampscott, MA age 21
Property owner: who ya gonna call? Mr Gesualdi owns a few properties in Amherst.
26 comments:
the building is only worth $92,000? wow. I gotta get me some houses in Amherst!
When will UMass step in? Do they even care?
http://www.umass.edu/dean_students/codeofconduct/
Larry, when the APD stop at some of the Section 8 Rentals that they had to drive by to get to this house, then I will agree with you. Not before.
Can you imagine living next to this? Those poor people.
Ed, whe APD gets a call about the section 8 rentals they will stop there too. Maybe their neighbors don't care as much about peace and quiet?
This is a neighborhood where sound carries pretty darn easily and far.
So the grand total of fines levied on that house now is....??????
And how much actually collected???
These are tomorrow's leaders?
No, these are the next section 8 housing residents LOL!!!!
Nice.
T.V. too loud, get arrested in Amherst.
Commmme onnnn down!!!!
What are the chances departing seniors will pay their $300 fines?
Probably will when the get a registered return receipt letter from the criminal court a year or so down the road.
As a way to collect the fines promptly, simply make registration for the following semester or year contingent on students paying all outstanding fines owed to the town of Amherst. Then Amherst doesn't have to spend time and money tracking them down or responding to their lawyers or showing up in court.
And for seniors make it like parking tickets received on campus: pay them up or no diploma.
Or don't come on down. That would be ok.
Swampscott? Northborough? Stay home. See if we care.
I know you think that we're addicted to your almighty student dollars. But many of us have jobs here that are not dependent on you. And for every student who can't live peaceably with neighbors, there's someone to replace that student who can.
If you don't like it here, please feel free to go home and live with mom and pop.
Can't wait for late May and the peace and quiet.
"Can't wait for late May and the peace and quiet."
Graduation is Fri (the 13th)- so things will start quieting down... (unfortunately summers aren't as quiet as they once were)
Here's what I don't get:
If these students hate us, hate living here, hate the entire area, why are they here? You can acquire educational credentials just about anywhere.
Some are stuck in a time warp and still think the glory days of "zoo mass" still exist. Wrong.
I don't get why you need to drag the property owner into this. No reason the landlord should have to police their tenants, we have police for that. I think most people know the state of Massachusetts actively works to keep property owners from evicting tenants anyhow.
I like your theory, Larry: that the rest of us have been conscripted into conforming to a time-honored tradition for UMass, that essentially embraces this kind of hooliganism as part of "the appeal of the place."
In short, "if we can't party loudly, wildly, and frequently, it wouldn't be UMass."
It is long past time to push back hard against this.
Or the glory daze of Amherst.
(if there ever was one)
Anon 5:46 am is right. It is important to remember the limited power and influence that landlords have over tenants under the laws of the Commonwealth. The students hold the whip hand here, both over their landlords and over the level of peace and tranquillity enjoyed by their neighbors.
If we don't wrestle this problem to the ground, there are avenues of economic development that we will not be able to explore, simply because of the legitimate distrust of permanent residents about the behavior of students.
Oh I think with some landlords in this town--as long as the brats pay the exorbitant rent--make no attempt to exert power or influence.
But maybe when those landlords start getting $300 tickets from the town for nuisance house violations of their tenants they will come up with a plan.
landlords have the power to evict tenants. neighbors have the power to sue landlords whose properties create nuisances.
Let's face it most landlords if not all are profiter's. When they decide to rent they consider how to get as much as they can out of it with the least amount put into it. They are not renting vacation spots and know they will always find someone to occupy these houses. I agree with the fact that if we don't hold everyone involved accountable, then we are destine to repeat history over and over again. If fining the landlords gets them to do a annual inspection of their properties then so be it. I'd be willing to bet there are many that if you cornered them and asked how many occupants are living in their house, and what is the current condition of their property. They would not be able to answer you. They would probably say something to the tune off "there should only be (X) amount of people living there and it's probably in pretty good shape" basiclly dodging the questions. I know it must be difficult to maintain these properties, but they took that resposibility on when they started rent them out.
When did 9PM become late night in Amherst? (see article about this loud get together in the Bulletin)
"I don't get why you need to drag the property owner into this. No reason the landlord should have to police their tenants, we have police for that."
At every apartment I've lived, which is more than I can count, the landlord/property manager controlled noise, property maintenance, upkeep, parking enforcement and everything else. If a neighbor was loud, I called the landlord - not the police. If a neighbor parked in my space or vice versa, the manager was called - not the police. Yes he or she had to get up at all hours of the night. But there was free rent in it plus a salary. Amherst taxpayers should not be paying to manage property.
Post a Comment