"Showing Off"

Car vs tree (tree always wins)

At the scene of the accident that demolished his car and sent two passengers to Baystate Medical Center -- one still "critical" -- Sean M Foster admitted to police that had consumed alcohol and was "showing off" when he lost control of his vehicle in North Amherst and intersected with a tree.

You have to wonder if his lawyer will try to have his confession thrown out since he was legally drunk at the time with a Blood Alcohol Content reading of .20% (2.5 times over the legal limit).

 

Sean Foster, age 22, awaiting arraignment yesterday in Eastern Hampshire District Court

The Price of Fun?

 

Sean M Foster about to be arraigned in Eastern Hampshire District Court this morning

In District Court this morning with his mother, who posted $500 cash bail, Sean M. Foster had a plea of not guilty entered in his behalf and his case was continued to November 3 so he could hire his own attorney.

In addition to the $500 bail, Mr. Foster, age 22, will undergo random alcohol screening while on bail.

 

Demolished vehicle.  Note APD interviewing occupants

In a spectacular accident early Sunday morning, Sean Foster piloted his vehicle into a tree just off North East Street (yards before it becomes Henry Street) in North Amherst, where the posted speed limit is 35 MPH.

The impact demolished his car and sent two of his (four) passengers to Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, one of whom is in critical condition.

1:45 AM ish

The Morning After:

 Tree seems to have survived impact

Retracing path of vehicle.  Note curve with Shutesbury Road, Flat Hills on right.  Distance to tree impact from there about 225 feet of straight road.

 Mailbox did not survive impact

View of road just before hitting tree on left

Photos/videos by Larry Kelley.  All rights reserved

Another Disturbing DUI

Car vs tree Henry Street (note engine block ripped away from frame)

Last night first responders rushed to the north end of town around 1:30 AM for reports of a high speed crash involving a car, tree, and most likely alcohol (the person calling for help from the scene sounded drunk).

 

2 AFD ambulances on scene

Initial reports from the scene indicated one person trapped and unconscious in the back seat.  But by the time the AFD Engines arrived all occupants (at least four "college aged youth") were out of the demolished vehicle.

Amherst police charged the 22-year-old driver with driving under the influence of alcohol but he's still in the hospital, so I probably will not see him tomorrow in Eastern Hampshire District Court.

The accident tied up two ambulances needed to transport two victims to Baystate Critical Care unit in Springfield.  Since Bay State is 25 miles or so from Amherst, versus 7 for Cooley Dickinson Hospital, those ambulances are out of service for two or three times longer.

Two engines responded to help clean up potentially hazardous fluids and three police cars to seal off the area and interview the occupants.  And even though it was 2:00 AM there were still service calls that had to be put on hold due to the strain on resources this one potentially deadly accident caused.

The Shadow knows ...

 The car was traveling north and crossed over the southbound lane into a tree

Last month another spectacular accident in the dead of night involving high speed and alcohol occurred on the opposite side of town, scenic South East Street.

Bumper was ripped off and thrown about 20 yards

All photos by Larry Kelley.  All rights reserved.

Timely Letter to Town Manager Musante concerning South East Street traffic

September Storm

 APD Chief Livingstone (left) UMPD Chief John Horvath (right)

The difference in number of arrests this past September between Amherst Police Department, with 45 sworn officers making 92 arrests, 45 of them UMass students , and the UMass Police Department with 62 sworn officers making 81 arrests, 55 of them UMass students is interesting but not overly startling.

Amherst police with a department 37% smaller than their UMass counterparts made 14% more arrests.   Of course the difference on the day of the infamous Blarney Blowout was far more dramatic with APD making 55 arrests to UMPD only 3. 

Last year in September, when students first flock back to Amherst, 5,500 of them freshmen leaving home for the first time, Amherst Police Department made 263 arrests or almost three times the number (92) made just this past September.  Now that is somewhat startling.

I asked APD Chief Scott Livingstone about that:

Click to enlarge/read

Since APD recently received "Department Of The Month" from Mothers Against Drunk Driving, obviously they have not slacked off on that vitally important function.

But now being down 5 officers, four of them due to on-duty injuries, the month of October -- when the weather is still conducive to outdoor socializing -- is going to be even more of a challenge.

Especially since Halloween falls on a Friday this year.  That alone is scary, even when the overworked department is at full strength.

Hate that awkward moment when your friend calls you and asks you for $240 to bail them out at UMPD. Happy Saturday
— ZooMass (@ZooMass) October 4, 2014

Shock Therapy @ Amherst Middle School

Calvin Terrell defending his "warrior" philosophy to a packed meeting of unhappy parents

In the wake of the Newtown/Sandy Hook tragedy you would think a public speaker addressing children in a forced school assembly would be careful about conjuring up images for such an impressionable audience to contemplate:  like that of a  beloved five-year-old being shot in the head,  with the resulting damage so great the wake is closed casket.

Or the other adult person you love, also involved in this hypothetical active shooter scenario, ending up dead from gunfire as well. 

What any of this has to do with improving racial harmony I'm not overly sure.  Neither were the traumatized kids who heard this explicit speaker, Calvin Terrell, doing his shtick yesterday morning at Amherst Regional Middle School.  Even scarier, he prefaced his performance by saying this would be his "5th grade presentation".

School officials had to make counselors available all day yesterday and plan to do so today as well.

ARMS Principal Marisa Mendonsa addresses standing room only crowd of upset parents

At a contentious "coffee with the principal" this morning at ARMS attended by almost 50 parents -- 90% of them displeased with yesterday's performance -- Mr. Terrell apologized for his graphic presentation.

School Principal Marisa Mendonsa apologized for not making sure "parental notification" went out the day before, warning about the potentially upsetting nature of the graphic talk.

Numerous parents used the term "inappropriate",  with one going so far as to brand it, "totally irresponsible, it was horrible!"  When Terrell likened himself to Santa Claus, an angry parent shot back:  "You were not Santa Claus, you were the Grim Reaper."

One parent confirmed his child had to leave the assembly that morning to find a bathroom and then threw up. 

Terrell defended his invocation of the Sandy Hook horror by comparing the universal devastation brought on nationwide by that tragedy, yet people don't get  upset when millions die in the Congo.

Kind of like saying 9/11 was not such a big deal because only 3,000 died vs the 10,000 who die annually via drunk drivers or 400,000 who die from cigarettes.

Other parents were upset with his use of the word "retard" when describing an incident of bullying. Of course one parent wondered if he would be so quick to have used the "N-word" in such a scenario.

 Talib Sadiq, Climate Coordinator and Principal Mendonsa stand before parents

While the presentation yesterday morning was not filmed, school officials confirmed that Mr. Terrell will redo his performance next Thursday night at the Middle School so parents can get a taste of what their children endured for two hours.

Better yet, he should simply be terminated from his $38,000 contract.  Now!

Schools start to backpedal

Witness vs Informant

Chancellor Subbaswamy and Stan Rosenberg Saturday UMass Homecoming Parade

Well I guess there goes the Pulitzer Prize for the venerable Boston Globe.

According to Northwestern District Attorney Dave Sullivan, drug OD victim Eric L. Sinacori, age 20, was not a UMass Police Department snitch, err, I mean informant.  He was a "witness" in a case against a drug dealer.

Kind of a BIG difference wouldn't you say? 

Although I'm going out on a journalistic limb at the moment by not corroborating that claim with another reliable source, but if you can't trust the District Attorney who can you trust?

And one of my other problems with the original Globe article was they seemed to think they could guarantee the young man's anonymity.  In this day and age.

I had a couple dozen Google referrals on Sunday to the story I did four months ago from folks doing a search for "acute heroin intoxication, Amherst".

Even the Gazette figured it out, since the Globe article published the date he died.  And the medical examiner has to file a death certificate in the municipality in which the person died (although it takes six months).

UMass PR folks at first seemed to be showing support to UMPD, but backed down last night and issued a statement from the Chancellor suspending the use of informants until a full review.  Today both the Boston Globe and Springfield Republican did editorials cheering that backpedaling.

I have no problem with requiring informants to get counseling if indeed they are addicted.  But to require parents be informed is simply a deal breaker.  You might as was well require UMPD to take out an ad in the Daily Collegian naming their informants.  

So yes, even though (apparently) Eric Sinacori was not a police informant, PR conscious UMass will probably go ahead and kill the program anyway.

And a year or two from now some kid will die of an OD that could have been prevented if his/her dealer was arrested via use of an informant. 

DA Dave Sullivan Statement Eric Sinacori

RAWG Rambles On

 Regional Agreement Working Group last night

After three years of meetings you would think the 12-member Regional Agreement Working Group, made up of three representatives from all four towns in the current Middle and High School Region (Amherst, Pelham, Leverett, and Shutesbury) could figure out a workable plan to simply extend what we already have now in grades 7-12, down to kindergarten level.

You would think.  But nooooooo.

The Regional Agreement Working Group wants to present a plan to the Regional School Committee sometime soon (actually more like a year ago).  Last night's meeting, however, was still not to be the last.

Next meeting, and hopefully last, is scheduled for October 15.

The current 9 member Regional School Committee (5 Amherst, 2 Pelham, one each from Leverett and Shutesbury) will have to support the proposed educational expansion by a two-thirds vote (not hard to get) and then all four towns will need a majority vote of their Town Meeting's in order to amend the Regional Agreement (very hard to get).

Tricky part is Shutesbury has already opted out of the expansion but wants to have the option to come in somewhere in the future.  And since their Town Meeting yes vote is mandatory for the entire project to go forward, the other three towns are trying to keep them somewhat happy. 

Last night the group voted to allow a town already in the 7-12 Region (say, Shutesbury for instance) to join somewhere in the future as long as any "negative impacts" are mitigated.  The words "by right" were stricken and replaced with "welcomed," but only if the negatives are overcome.

Thus the other three towns still have the option to say "no" if the negatives are not dealt with to their satisfaction.

1st Resolution passed unanimously previously, 2nd passed last night 8-0-1 (abstention)

By having this "on ramp" built in to the Regional Agreement now it simplifies the process in the future when only a two-thirds vote of the (new) Regional School Committee will be required to allow the town entry.

RAWG also approved other procedural concepts:   Elementary school closings (for the economic good of the Region) would require a "supermajority" of 8 votes, thus Amherst with its proposed 7 committee members cannot invoke their tyranny on a smaller town all by themselves.  Hiring a Superintendent to lead the district would also require 8 vote supermajority.

They unanimously supported the current status quo for amending the Regional Agreement:  two thirds vote of the Regional School Committee and then a positive vote in all four Town Meetings.

Since Amherst makes up 88% of the current Region the forced rational for "fair" representation with only a little over 50% of the slotted positions on the Committee reserved for Amherst, is the concept of "District Wide Election."



Voters in all four towns would vote for all members (even candidates from the other towns) of the new Regional School Committee.   Thus, theoretically, elected members will think more as a regional representatives rather than putting their town first.

Which of course flies in the face of human nature.

Amherst voters are already unhappy with the way the our expensive schools are running, so they are not going to be enthused about expanding the operation, especially when there seems to be no discernible cost benefit.

In fact it will probably increase the cost for Amherst, which already has a cost per student 30% over state average. 

The initial vote to make this happen could also prove problematic in a Keystone Cops sort of way.  Theoretically only two towns, say Amherst and Pelham, could vote to join the new Region.

But the other two (Leverett and Shutesbury) who don't join now (but still have the on-ramp option down the road) would still have elected members on the new Regional School Committee who could block any major decision requiring a supermajority.

Can you say "confusing"?