In the past year I've spotted and photographed three vehicles in town center with a "denver boot" attached. Being bright orange they are pretty hard to miss. And all three times, within hours, the driver had paid their parking tickets so the boot would be removed.
According to Treasurer/Collector Parking Director Claire McGinnis the town has two boots although she can only remember maybe one occasion over the past ten years when both were in use at the same time.
The boot is used when a driver has accumulated five unpaid tickets, and since a simple parking meter violation is only $10 that five ticket threshold is not all that much in actual dollars. Of course there's additional late fees on each ticket, and an additional $25 charge to remove the boot, $50 the second time and $75 the third time.
Which is why I'm a little surprised this driver has not gotten the message, and still let the parking meter expire.
Town takes in almost as much in fines/violations as it does for routine meter fees
Ron Bohonowicz extolled the southwest view to consider for library location
The Wildwood School Building Committee met yesterday in the Middle School for the first time since the Amherst School Committee pretty much boxed them in for building designs with their controversial 4-1 vote in favor of grade reconfiguration that requires two separate schools under one roof.
Amherst School (aka Wildwood) Building Committee yesterday
After almost two hours of painstaking presentation of four options that meet the ASC requirement, Building Committee Chair Mike Morris pretty much dismissed two of the options because they require "swing space" -- a temporary location to hold classes for all the students displaced by construction.
Four options (pretty much whittled down to two)
Mr. Morris pointed out there are no spaces in Amherst large enough to handle all the Wildwood students and so the Schools would have to rent space at six or eight different locations strewn about the entire town.
Therefor due to "safety, learning and transportation considerations" he would prefer to avoid using swing space. Superintendent Maria Geryk was nodding her head in agreement as he spoke.
Since the presentations took up most of the scheduled time for the two hour meeting the group will discuss and decide at their next meeting February 2, but it's pretty safe to assume the choice will be between W10 ($60,893,000) and W12 ($67,176,167).
Maria Kopicki warns during Public Comment that public sentiment needs to be more carefully considered
Coincidentally the Amherst Finance Committee met in Town Hall just after the School Building Committee adjourned and during the "member report" Marylou Theilman brought up the school building project.
She presented a spreadsheet to the FinCom showing cost options for the Amherst short list as well as the most recent costs of school projects across the state financed by MSBA.
One member wondered what the role of the Finance Committee would be in this process? Chair Kay Moran pointed out they are advisers to Town Meeting, and it would be Town Meeting and then the voters who approve a debt exclusion Override to fund the new school construction project.
And even after it passes Town Meeting, although Ms. Moran thought it would be a "high hurdle" because it requires two-thirds support, it could still fall under their purview to educate the voters as to the financial implications of a yes vote: A $200 year tax increase for 30 years on an average home.
And maybe where Amherst currently sits for property tax rates statewide (in the top ten).
Ms. Theilman did say she was somewhat surprised when talking to one of the architects to learn that the moisture problems at Wildwood or Fort River would be solved by a simple renovation. The old foundation is dug up, removed, and a moisture barrier installed before a new foundation is poured.
School & Construction officials appear before Amherst Select Board 1/11/16 with Vince stalking in background
The Planning Board voted unanimously (6-0) last night to sponsor two pro-development zoning articles for the annual Town Meeting that in all likelihood would have made the warrant as citizens petitions and Planning Board Chair David Webber pointed out they would have to do the same amount of work anyway, whether they are sponsoring them or not.
The hoped for outcome is by having the Planning Board sponsor the articles they will have more weight and be better received on the floor of Town Meeting.
Although anti-development NIMBY Town Meeting members have often portrayed the Planning Board as being cheerleaders for developers, so it could also be the kiss of death.
And a change in zoning requires a two-thirds vote, thus a stubborn minority can hold up vitally needed developments until the cows come home (which in Amherst is seldom to never).
Changing the zoning from Office Park to Business Limited for the 5.79 acre parcel that sits between a busy office park to the south and a shopping center to the north would allow a developer to build 32 units of student rental townhouses.
Currently the property generates less than $100 per year in taxes
In 2010 Town Meeting voted down the identical zoning request mainly due to concerns about wetlands and drainage. Attorney Tom Reidy told the Planning Board last night the developer has already completed a wetlands delineation study and consulted with the DPW about the drainage problem which may be solved by installing a larger pipe.
The Business Improvement District requested the other zoning tweak which would allow for residential construction in Business Limited Districts along three B-L locations around the downtown.
The article would exempt mixed use projects (commercial/residential) from the 20,000 square foot basic minimum lot area requirement known "Footnote B."
Three B-L districts in downtown (circled in red). Click to enlarge
This article, however, would have no impact on the University Drive property should it be successfully rezoned to B-L because the number of housing units already proposed are limited by wetlands.
The Planning Board will hold public hearings on February 17 and March 2nd for the proposals. Town Meeting starts May 2nd.
Fort River Elementary School does have extensive outdoor recreation facilities to lose
One of the more interesting things to come out of the public firefight at the Amherst School Committee meeting last night was the leaking of information regarding other building projects that do not seem to get any attention at all: DPW and South Fire Station new buildings.
Vince O'Connor hatched a conspiracy plot about town officials wishing to abandon Fort River Elementary School in favor of a Wildwood mega-school, which is really twin schools under one roof, so it would then free up Fort River for the new DPW building.
DPW has outgrown its 100 year old building
And moving the DPW from it's current home in one of the classier neighborhoods in Amherst would then free up that location for the new South Fire Station, which has to be located within one mile of Amherst town center in order to abandon tired, old, cramped Central Station.
Which could then be sold to the highest bidder to create a trendy mixed use business/residential building in the heart of downtown.
Central Station could be razed for a new five story mixed use building (especially if a Parking Garage is built out back)
Thus we get three new municipal buildings -- School, Fire and DPW -- with no land acquisition costs.
Unsurprisingly the Amherst School Committee after two hours of public hearing -- more than half of it criticism from the general public -- voted 4-1 in favor of the administration's preferred "Grade Reconfiguration 2-6" model that will create a 750 student two-wing school and turn Crocker Farm Elementary School into a pre K-1st Grade early childhood education superstore.
Interestingly this 'separate but equal' concept of twin schools under one roof is the result of concerns over equity for students of color, low-income and single-parent families (and combinations thereof) that make up a sizable percentage of the Amherst public school population.
Crowd of 40 attended, many of them critical of mega-school
The only School Committee member who had not telegraphed her vote last week was Kathleen Traphaghan. In her presentation she extensively cited her 14-year-old son as a main source for information for this epic decision, which is sort of like a smoking enthusiast justifying their bad habit by citing their grandfather who smoked two-packs a day since teen years and lived to be 93.
Traphagen also criticized the local hometown newspaper for pre-coverage of this "agonizing" decision as being "flippant," making it seem that cost was not a factor. "We live in this town like everybody else", she said with a sigh.
Costs will come in between $61.2 and $66.3 million depending on Wildwood School Building Committee pick
Black sheep member of the 5-member School Committee Vira Douangmany Cage played her usual watchdog role, questioning the process as a violation of Open Meeting Law, since the agenda posted on the town website did not clearly show a vote would be taken.
Agenda posted on town website does not clearly indicate a vote would be taken
ASC Chair Katherine Appy responded that the agenda was clear on the school website and this was pretty much the way they always did things.
Last year, after a number of posting snafus that cancelled meetings at the last minute, the Regional School Committee voted to allow posting of meetings and agendas on the ARPS Regional website rather than relying on hard copy postings in all four towns. The state does allow this, but only for regional entities, which the Amherst School Committee is not.
Former Amherst School Committee member Andy Churchill spoke in favor of reconfiguration
Crocker Farm Principal Derek Shea spoke in favor of making his school preK-1st Grade
The Wildwood School Building Committee will discuss the School Committee decision tomorrow night as they have the final authority with the Massachusetts School Building Authority for a single project that will receive between 50 and 55% reimbursement from the state.
According to Assistant Superintendent Mike Morris (also chair of the Wildwood School Building Committee):
"There will be
discussion of the options at the SBC meeting tomorrow and a vote at the
2/2 SBC meeting on the Preferred Schematic Report (a submission to the
MSBA that includes this choice). As mentioned at last Wednesday's
meeting and community forum, another design option (W11) that is very
similar to W5 but made for the 750 student building will be presented,
so there are four potential building designs to consider (W11, W10, W7,
FR5)."
Forever activist Vince O'Connor predicts disaster for the Reconfiguration scenario
O'Connor's preferred choise is twice as expensive
Vince O'Connor, who championed the most expensive concept of using the MSBA to deal with Wildwood only and have the town go it alone renewing Fort River, exposed a conspiracy theory that town officials wish to close down Fort River so it could be used as the new Department of Public Works building, another mega-building-project on the immediate horizon.
O'Connor also predicted the MSBA will not even approve the Reconfiguration model since it does not have overwhelming public support. And even if it does make it to the floor of Town Meeting for a debt exclusion Override vote, it will fail like the elementary school Override did back in 1992.
With Amherst property tax rates already in the top ten statewide, the $200+ added to the average tax bill by a debt exclusion Override for another 30 years to finance this mega-school is going to be a very tough sell. School officials are putting all their eggs in this one expensive basket.
Indeed the die is now cast, the Rubicon has been crossed. Let's hope School Superintendent Maria Geryk fares a tad better than Julius Caesar.
Mike Morris and Maria Geryk listening to critical public comments
Kathleen Traphagen not happy with most recent Gazette story as well
DPW Chief Guilford Mooring brought the latest plans for the roundabout at Triangle and East Pleasant Street near the new Kendrick Place mixed use building to the Public Works Committee on Thursday night.
This would make the 9th time it has appeared on their agenda over the past two years.
Public Works Committee meeting (1/14/16)
PWC audience
Major tweaks include a new system of (5) crosswalks that avoid going through the center of the roundabout, removal of a small island over on the side closest to UMass so a "slip lane" can allow for PVTA buses and trucks to make the turn. It also allows for the sidewalk to be brought down from the current top of a steep hill to grade level.
Sidewalk on left will be brought down to street level (tree and island in center will go)
A half dozen citizens -- mostly neighbors -- showed up to voice their concerns, which seemed to center on pedestrian safety. Both Mooring and PWC Chair Christine Gray-Mullen pointed out that roundabouts are safer than signalized intersections.
Vince O'Connor was also concerned about the space provided in the roundabout for a car to stop for pedestrians and he would like it large enough to accommodate a PVTA bus. Mr. O'Connor was also concerned about dedicated bike lanes all the way through the roundabout.
Mooring pointed out that cyclists could simply act as regular vehicles in the roundabout or use "chicken lanes" i.e. the sidewalks.
The PWC recommended the crosswalk in front of Kendrick Place be moved about 20 feet into the middle of the slip lane, halfway between E. Pleasant and Triangle Street.
The PWC will vote their recommendation to the Select Board at their next meeting in February, and if all goes well construction could start in the upcoming construction season.
UMass Eastman Lane/N. Pleasant roundabout is considered a great success
