New Town Logo: Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything
Amherst downtown business community dodged a dirty bomb last night as Town Meeting -- all too narrowly -- rejected by 97 Yes-83 No (but it required a 2/3 Yes vote) a citizen petition article requiring strict parking requirements with any new development in the Municipal Parking District which currently exempts such parking requirements.
CVS parking lot downtown
And the common sense reason for that is parking is very expensive, and takes up precious space. Besides, Amherst is a "green community" where walking, cycling, skateboarding and public transportation are highly encouraged.
The scary thing about last night is that more than a majority of Town Meeting members supported this anti-business, no growth strategy.
Currently Amherst has an out of whack tax base: 10% commercial, 90% residential. Hadley by comparison has 34% commercial tax base and 66% residential. And their property tax rate is almost half that of Amherst.
All of their commercial property is located along the RT9 corridor, aka two shopping malls, which provide plenty of free parking. No wonder our downtown is struggling.
The other anti-development travesty last night was the scuttling of Article 23, which would have rezoned four adjacent properties bordering UMass and Amherst town center, thus allowing greater housing density.
Currently problem #1 in our little college town is lack of housing.
Currently problem #1 in our little college town is lack of housing.
Naturally the neighbors, whose backyards run down a steep incline into the zone would have none of it. And naturally, because we're talking Amherst Town Meeting, their NIMBY sentiments prevailed.


.jpg)

.jpg)


.jpg)







.jpg)

