Amherst Planning Board last night (like lambs to slaughter)
Last year at the very last minute the Planning Board pulled back their Inclusionary Zoning overhaul that would require across the board 10% affordable units in any new housing project of 10 units or more.
They were reacting to concerns from the business community who complained it would make things especially arduous in the downtown or Village Centers where development costs are higher.
One good result was the town came up with Article 21, tax incentives to help alleviate the pain for developers who otherwise can't make the affordable unit requirement work.
Last night Town Meeting, considering it required a two-thirds vote, overwhelmingly rejected the Planning Board's two-years-in-the-making Inclusionary Zoning Article 22 by a 100 No to 88 Yes vote after 1.5 hours of sometimes snippy discussion.
Critics said it was unnecessary simply because the Planning Board was not correctly interpreting the current Inclusionary Zoning bylaw which trips the 10% affordable unit requirement whenever a Special Permit is required.
The Kendrick Place development (36 units) required two concessions -- an extra 10 feet of height and extra lot coverage -- but they were not considered major enough to trip the existing bylaw.
And of course this same scenario played out just up the road with the same developer's One East Pleasant Street (80 units).
Using future home of One East Pleasant as leasing office for Kendrick Place
As a result certain BANANA (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything) types now consider the Planning Board to be made up of Robber Baron, pro-development hacks.
Will the Planning Board take another shot at appeasing the unappeasable next year? Who could blame them if they do not.
Sure Article 21, the property tax breaks package, did pass because the unholy alliance of the BANANA/NIMBY crowd faltered. But will that alone make a difference? Probably not.
Perhaps the best idea last night came from black sheep Town Meeting member Kevin Collins, who floated the sometimes-you-have-to-destroy-the-Village-in-order-to-save-it concept by suggesting we allow the town to fall below the 10% Subsidized Housing Index.
Click to enlarge/read
That way any developer can come in and build pretty much whatever they want as long as it is 25% affordable.
Maybe now that town/gown relations seem to be at a high water mark, it's time to revive the Gateway Project.
Gateway Area with former Frat Row (on right) shovel ready for a signature project