Mainstream media this fine morning
Okay, which is it? Is UMass President Robert Caret going to keep an "open mind" even though he doesn't "like the feel" of the UMass Police Department informant program, or does he just flat out oppose the program as indicated by today's Gazette above-the-fold headline?
Of course keep in mind this is the same bureaucrat who just days after the Little Bighorn, err, Blarney Blowout, told the same media in regards to the response of overwhelmed police: "There looked to be some
unprovoked overreaction." (emphasis mine)
Caret also went on to show how well he does his research (this from a higher-education leader) by questioning why town officials allowed bars to
open early on the infamous day of the Blarney Blowout, which is just flat out
not true.
UMass Chancellor Subbaswamy has named a "working group"
of 11 -- as opposed to a "committee" which would be subject to Open Meeting Law -- to come back by the end of the semester with a recommendation concerning the use of informants by UMPD.
Considering only one of the 11 is in law enforcement (and his paycheck is dependent on keeping President Caret happy), safe bet the program will be scuttled.
Public
Relations taking priority over Public Safety.
In the particular case of
Eric Sinacori the one question that really needs answering is did he go from an "informant", where his ID is protected, to a "witness", where his ID is not protected, and then go back to being an "informant".
Because under
those conditions, even in the bucolic backwater of Amherst, his safety would have been compromised.