Highest elected officials in town are paid $300 annually
Saying that when she mentions their annual $300 stipend most people laugh, Select Board member Connie Kruger told the Finance Committee this morning the Select Board compensation issue, although awkward for her to talk about because of obvious self-interest, boils down to "respect of the office."
Select Board members are reimbursed for some out-of-pocket expenses, but the issue really is their time. Lots of it. This past Fiscal Year they met 33 times, with each meeting lasting around three hours. Not to mention all the prep time preparing for each meeting.
And the simply fact that their stipend (and that of the Moderator) has not increased since the mid-1970s, so inflation alone calls for quadrupling the current amount.
Finance Committee this morning. Chair Kay Moran 2nd from right
Most Finance Committee members were sympathetic to the issue with member Bernie Kubiak agreeing strongly: "It should be increased considering the importance and amount of time ... I think $300 is a joke”
But newly reelected Chair Kay Moran thought it was a "policy issue" that should first be fleshed out with an exact amount by either the Select Board or a committee they appoint, and then come back to the Finance Committee like any financial article.
Member Steve Braun had to leave early before a vote was taken but told the committee on his way out, "I'm in favor of raising it."
Vice Chair Marylou Theilman made a motion to "Refer the question of compensation/stipend back to the Select Board as a policy issue." That motion passed unanimously 6-0.
Connie Kruger said she was happy with that, as the Select Board may now feel more comfortable discussing the issue.
In other financial matters the Finance Committee voted unanimously to transfer $251,176 from their "Reserve Fund" to last year's DPW budget to cover cost overruns on "snow and ice removal."
The original $280,000 DPW budget was overrun by almost twice the amount, coming in at $531,000.
Area compensations. Described as "all over the map."
What's the right amount?
ReplyDelete$1,000?
$10,000?
$100,000?
Seems to me it's basically volunteering, so it should just stay as it is. No one is forcing you to be on the select board.
$10,000 sound about right.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the $10,000 number. Even that will probably work out to less than minimum wage.
ReplyDeleteEven better I would propose paying Town Meeting Members in some fashion to improve the pool of candidates.
The best way to improve Town Meeting is to get rid of it.
ReplyDeleteI believe they wind up getting a hell of a lot more than $10,000 -- they are employees of the Town of Amherst, are they not? That means that each year they get the $300 is a year of eligibility for a state retirement pension, which is calculated on the basis of what you earned in your "three best years" -- the three years in which you earned the most money. Not your average (mean, median, or modal) but your three "best."
ReplyDeleteThat's how Billy Bulger has his truly outrageous pension -- all the years in the state senate at $20K and then a few years with a six figure salary at UMass, he gets 80% of his three best years at UM.
And are they eligible for the GIC health benefits? That's really nice health insurance and the only reason I was with the AHA for as long as I was. And even if you have to pay 25% or 30% of it, there is a lot of real money going to pay the rest.
Maybe the town should consider compensating School Committee members more too? Don't they get a small stipend right now as well?
ReplyDeleteThough obviously no person would serve on the Select Board or School Committee just for the money, it would be nice to provide a little more compensation to reflect the importance of what they do, & how much time it takes.
Didn't Trevor Baptiste just bring up a motion related to this at the Pelham Town Meeting? My recollection was that no action was taken, but maybe I'm misremembering.
I agree. Currently the SC gets nothing. They also put in many many hours. Well the ones who do more than go to the regular meetings put in a ton of time. They should be compensated. Northampton pays their SC members.
DeleteLarry the population of Amherst is not 37,000. If you remove the students, it's around 6,000
ReplyDeleteMAYOR
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYes to Mayor. No to population of 6,000.
ReplyDeleteAnd just because someone is "college aged" doesn't necessarily make them a college/university student.
Amherst census total 2010 population was 37,819. The housing production plan at page 8 states that the "college or graduate school students" were 22,470 in 2010. This makes the year-round non-student population 15,349 (NOT 6,000). And of course a lot of students stick around in the summer too.
ReplyDeleteStill...15,349 is a heck of a lot less than 37,000
ReplyDeleteThe Select Board should get nothing. Musante should be fired, or thrown in jail (along with the school superintendent). We need to have a Mayor and a City charter. This small village crap has gone on long enough. Amherst could be so much more than it is.
ReplyDeletePutting on my sarcasm font: "Tell me how you really feel."
ReplyDelete$0 is the right amount: it's a civic duty, not a job.
ReplyDelete- A former selectman