I don't pretend to understand all the intricacies of "Common Core," but I do know there are a goodly number of parents greatly concerned about its implementation in the Amherst Regional Public Schools.
Anyone interested in staying informed on a grass roots roots level can send an email to: amherstforeducation@gmail.com
#####
All,
I just wanted to say sorry for the delay in getting everyone’s
email together. I offered to put this
together as it seemed there were many parents who needed help getting organized
with other parents.
For those of you who don’t now me, I have served on two
School Councils, helped various SC members run for election, volunteered on
Playground rebuilds, was a member of the K-16 math council, served on a few
teacher hiring committees, and various other informal groups working for better
schools.
My kids are no longer in the Amherst school system but from my experience
in working for change I learned a few things and from others who came before me
working for change.
All that being said, I hope at a minimum, I am able to get like
minded parents contact information to each other. I hope
this helps each of you reach a broader community concerned with education in
general and specifically today, the MS math curriculum.
To start I will be sending out a group email so each of you
can contact each other. Depending on
what the group wants I can set up a list serve (which is an email that goes out
to the group each time it is responded to), possibly a web site or blog depending
on time and group desires.
Many people have asked if there is a meeting with Rhonda
Cohen. To my knowledge no one has come
forth telling me of a group meeting.
From my experience with Rhonda she has no problem meeting with parents
in groups or one on one. If someone on
this list is so inclined they could set up that first initial meeting and share
it with the group.
I would recommend that each person who is posting realize
that with the number of people in this group you consider all documents public
documents. Emails are easily shared. If you would not say it in public you
probably don’t want to write it here.
Also I know several of you well or fairly well and there are
is a wide range of satisfaction with the schools system. Keeping comments respectful as well as having
a thick skin to harsher comments that may happen from time to time is important
when working with a group. You all want
the option for strong math curriculum and likely strong curriculum in general
for those kids who need or desire it. I
am sure many of the people on this list feel the need for good education on
social justice issues and quality special needs education as well. If you feel the need to vent (and we all do at
times) in a way that may that may offend others in the group please try to send
you communication to those very aligned with your mind set.
This being said, let me know what I can do (from experience
or technical aspects) to support you and we will go from there.
Good luck
Michael Jacques
What is the point of your post?
ReplyDeleteYou must be new.
ReplyDeleteMaybe your could be clearer. It's a re-post of a long memo. The memo doesn't say much, so I'm not sure what your point is.
ReplyDeleteThe memo doesn't strike me as "long". And it's also perfectly clear.
ReplyDeletePerhaps some of the usual paranoids can explain what the concern is.
ReplyDeleteThe post is about what many parents are concerned, the quality of our local K-12 public education.
ReplyDeleteIn general I am happy with the quality of the Amherst K-12 education. I only have concerns about the ability of kids to continue to be able to take algebra in the 8th grade and then the usual math courses after that in high school.
ReplyDeleteI think that the comments of anon@309 captures the concerns of those involved in the email posted.
ReplyDeleteAnon 3:09, how much did Maria Geryk pay you to post your comment?
ReplyDeleteSC only praise school admins. Then Algebra and Geometry are taken away from 7th graders quietly. Common core curriculum is the minimum standard. School admins quietly change our goal to be a minimum standard school. Parents and students are in the dark. We only find this out in this blog. This cannot go on!
ReplyDeleteK-12 education in ARPS are.all in danger. Maria Geryk, Rhonda Cohen, and Ian stitch are all responsible to this travesty to the parents and families.
Many of our students want and need alternative curriculum pathway for acceleration and choices.
School admins, listen to this. Fix your problems. Delay it, ignore it, you will see uprisings!
"Common core curriculum is the minimum standard. School admins quietly change our goal to be a minimum standard school."
ReplyDeleteThis is just complete nonsense. No such thing is happening.
to anon 9:26AM
ReplyDeleteEither you are new to the blog, or you refuse to acknowledge the fact. Here is some information from previous post.
1 Why Common core is minimum standard?
From the paper, Can This Country Survive Common Core’s College Readiness Level? by R. James Milgram and Sandra Stotsky. September 2013
The following was quoted from Dr. Jason Zimba, the lead Common Core Math Writer on Common Core Math's College-readiness level:
“Mr. Zimba said that the concept of college readiness is minimal and focuses on non-selective colleges."
“We have agreement to the extent that it’s a fuzzy definition, that the minimally college-ready student is a student who passed Algebra II.” (background knowledge: Most middle school and high school offer Math curriculum above algebra II, i.e. Trigonometry, pre-calculus, calculus AB, calculum BC, AP Physics (rigorous version require calculum BC).
Stotsky (a member of the state board at the time) later asked him to clarify what he meant. Zimba stated: “In my original remarks, I didn't make that point strongly enough or signal the agreement that we have on this—the definition of college readiness. I think it's a fair critique that it's a minimal definition of college readiness.”
Stotsky remarked at this point “for some clleges,” and Zimba responded by stating: “Well, for the colleges most kids go to, but not for the colleges most parents aspire to.”
Stotsky then asked “Not for STEM? Not for international competitiveness?” Zimba responded “Not only not for STEM, it’s also not for selective colleges. For example, for UC Berkeley, whether you are going to be an engineer or not, you'd better have precalculus to get into UC Berkeley.”
Stotsky then said: “Right, but we have to think of the engineering colleges and the scientific pathway.” Zimba added “That's true, I think the third pathway goes a lot towards that. But your issue is broader than that.”
In white paper, "Controlling Education from the top", Stotsky further argue the common core standard defines “college-readiness” as ready for a nonselective community college, not a four-year university.
2. Why Current School admin is running our school to a minimum standard school?
As we all know now, Algebra and geometry is taken away from current 7th graders and all lower graders that comes to middle school in the future.
School admin doesn't not plan to preserve existing alternative curriculum pathway, as agreed and even recommended by Common Core Math Designer, Jason Zimba. Current School Admin thought the common core is one size to fit all students needs. No Curriculum choice, or curriculum acceleration is necessary. They actually cut the existing alternative curriculum pathway from 7th graders on in middle school.
Instead, the school admins will use the Common Core, the minimum curriculum pathway, to replace existing flexible, multiple curriculum pathway. School Admins will use Common Core as SINGLE curriculum pathway.
From this, we conclude the school admin is going to run the school as minimum standard school.
To anon 9:26AM and other newcomers,
ReplyDeleteHere are some links from previous posts,
Source #1: Controlling Education from the top: (problems & deficiencies of Common Core Math and English Language Art)
http://truthinamericaneducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Controlling-Education-From-the-Top-PRINT.pdf
source #2: Can This Country Survive Common Core’s College Readiness Level? by R. James Milgram and Sandra Stotsky. September 2013
ftp://math.stanford.edu/pub/papers/milgram/ZimbaMilgramStotskyFinal.pdf
source #3: Two Moms vs. Common Core: Indiana is the first state to retreat from Common Core.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/347973/two-moms-vs-common-core
I am hoping that school admistrators will contact all parents and tell them about the changes in math in all schools. What evidence supports the changes?
ReplyDeleteLet the circling of the wagons by school administrators begin. Let the marginalizing of parents who question the plans of school administrators begin.
ReplyDeleteThis uprising is going to go right where all the others have gone: right back underground.
Do you ever feel that they are simply doing trial-and-error experiments with your child?
ReplyDeleteTrial and error?
ReplyDeleteNah, they're simply maintaining appearances.
Know what I mean?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6ZB7CsSw6Q
Rhonda Cohen, the director of teaching learning in Amherst Regional Schools came from Winchester, MA public school system. She stayed there for about an year. She killed some of the academic program in Winchester, MA public school. but she doesn't have time to kill all of them. As of today, the Winchester school has preserved some of the good the tradition of Math curriculum.
ReplyDeleteAt grade 7, Winchester school offers Pre-Algebra, Algebra 7, Advanced Algebra 7.
At Grade 8, Winchester School offers Pre-Albegra 8, Algebra 8, Algebra II, Advanced Algebra II.
Here is Winchester McCall Middle school web site for curriculum offerings.
http://www.edline.net/pages/McCall_Middle_School/mccall_departments/Mathematics
Winchester public school offers a broad spectrum Math curriculum in grade 7 and grade 8 to suite students of ALL abilities and needs. They offer pre-algebra, algebra I and algebra II in both grade 7 and grade 8, meaning similiar course is available and ready in different grades. whenever a student is ready, he/she can start to learn.
Why Winchester public school can preserve the good tradition of alternative curriculum pathways and flexibilities, and Amherst Regional school cannot.
Is it because Amherst Regional school has low school budget and cannot afford to provide challenging and excellent education to ALL its students when each of them is ready? No!
We have $18,000 education cost per student in our districts. That is very high in Massachusetts and across the nation. Where does the money go?
The School administrators split the money among themselves at the top of the pyramid before passing them down to the teachers.
Superintendent, Maria Geryk, has annual salary close to $150,000 a year.
Rhonda Cohen, director of teaching and learning, has an annual salary of $100,000 a year.
Ian Stith, K-8 coordinator of Math and Science, has an annual salary of $100,000 a year.
These three people sucks $350,000 a year from Amherst Regional School System. While these people are on Amherst Regional School's Taxpayer's payroll, they are planning to cut our curriculum to the bone of minimum curriculum pathway, deprive the curriculum choice and curriculum acceleration from our students, kill the alternative curriculum pathway that many school district (not just high performing school district) preserve.
Ah, Amherst. The gift that keeps on giving, where the people at the top are all hot air and ego. Just try watching a school committee meeting on ACTV. Unbelievable garbage. Who the hell are these people anyway?
ReplyDelete